 |
Marsh Beetle
Age: 50 million years old
Location: Poland Period: Eocene
Darwinists maintain that when mud was transformed as the work of chance by such natural phenomena as lightning over a long period, the result was possible for roses, carnations, birds, insects and humans who build cities, investigate the subparticles of the atom, compose symphonies and voyage into outer space. Even a primary-school student would regard this ludicrous, and illogical idea as deficient in logic, but for purely ideological reasons, evolutionists maintain it in all seriousness.
In a paper published in Scientific American magazine, the evolutionist George Wald described at length how chance could do anything if given sufficient time. As he went on to say:
“Given so much time, the 'impossible' becomes possible, the possible probable, and the probable virtually certain. One has only to wait: time itself performs the miracles.” (George Wald, "The origin of life'. Scientific American, vol. 191 (2), August 1954, p.48))
Wald’s words are most striking examples of evolutionist illogicality. The fact is that even after the passage of 2 billion or 100 billion years, stones and dirt will never be able to develop into human beings that feel, think, make judgments, rejoice, produce works of art, research, love and are loved by others. Life is the work of our Sublime and Mighty Lord, not of blind chance.
|
 |
Snail Shell
Age: 100 million years old
Location: Myanmar Period: Cretaceous
The specimen amber shown here is 100 million years old and contains a snail shell. The fact that there is no difference between the shells of present-day snails and those alive 100 million years ago totally invalidates evolutionists’ claims. Had snails evolved, as evolutionists maintain, then the structure of their shells 100 million years ago should be very different to that of shells today. But there is not the slightest difference between them, and this is one of the proofs that evolution never took place, and that Creation is the origin of life.
|
 |
Flutter Fly
Age: 50 million years old
Location: Poland Period: Eocene
By evaluating scientific findings from a neutral perspective, anyone can easily see that Darwin’s claims are untrue. To date, for example, Darwin’s claim that living species undergo small inherited changes over the course of time has not been supported by any scientific data. All we have are fantasies, the work of Darwinists’ imaginations, and ideological insistence.
The well-known British biologist Brian Goodwin describes how Darwin’s theory enjoys no scientific backing: Darwin's assumption that the tree of life is a consequence of the gradual accumulation of small hereditary differences appears to be without significant support. Some other process is responsible for the remergent properties of life, those distinctive features that separate one group of organisms from another—fishes and amphibians, worms and insects, horsetails and grasses. (George Wald, "The origin of life”, Scientific American, vol. 191 (2), August 1954, p.48)By referring to another process as responsible for the emergence of living things, Goodwin is actually referring to the fact of Creation, although he is reluctant to openly describe it as such. Yet the fact that he is so unwilling to admit can still be seen by anyone possessed of reason. |
